Stefan Christensen ← Back to writing
Leadership

What Setting a High Bar Requires

The bar is a contract, not a demand. What it takes to hold high standards and actually help people meet them.

High standards without support is just pressure wearing a leadership title.

Most leaders who think they hold a high bar hold half of one. They’re clear on expectations. They’re less clear on what it means to help someone meet them.

The Bar Is a Contract

When you tell someone you expect a lot from them, you’re making a commitment.

The bar isn’t just a demand, it’s a deal. You’re saying: I believe you’re capable of this, and I’ll be there to help you get there. When you set the bar and then disappear, you’ve broken your half of the deal.

I’ve had and experienced both failure modes across many companies, including during my consulting years at McKinsey. Leaders who held people to an extremely high standard while offering no real support. The team delivered, for a while, until the best people started leaving. And leaders so careful not to push too hard that the bar quietly dropped. Everyone felt cared for. Very little excellent work was produced.

Neither works. Both are half a deal.

What “Being There” Means

Most leaders think being there means checking in. Asking how it’s going. Saying “let me know if you need anything.”

That’s signaling availability without providing it.

I had a product manager: technically excellent, great instincts, strong on outcomes. But their written documents were written for the meeting, not for the reader. Ten bullets. Enough to run the room.

The problem was that documents have to work without your voice. People read before deciding whether to attend. The document is often the thing that determines who’s in the room and whether the right people come prepared. A document that only works when you’re there to explain it isn’t a document, it’s your personal speaker notes.

I tried explaining this. It didn’t land. The PM was polite about it but didn’t really believe the investment was worth it.

So we sat down together. Several hours in one week, working through an actual document, line by line. Not pair programming. Pair writing. Think of a parent sitting with a kid at the kitchen table, working through an essay together. Not writing it for them. Not reading it and handing back comments. Sitting there, working through the argument, finding where it breaks down, figuring out how to fix it. Unglamorous. Slow. Necessary.

The Moment the Bar Becomes Real

You can’t convince someone a standard matters by arguing for it. At some point they have to see it.

The meeting that followed was different. Instead of status updates, there were real discussions. Challenges came into the open. Decisions got made. Recognition happened naturally because the situation was clear. What had been a hard, often unfocused meeting, the kind that drains everyone, became the kind of meeting that moves things forward.

The second-order effects were what really landed. People who hadn’t been in the room came afterward asking questions, not to complain, but because the document had made things clear enough that they could engage with them. Work got unblocked. Things that had been murky became clear. The clarity propagated.

That’s when the PM understood why the bar was where it was. Not because I’d explained it better, but because they’d experienced it.

The Calibration Problem

You can’t offer that level of support to everyone at the same time.

You have multiple people, multiple teams, multiple pressures. Your time is finite. So the bar for growth isn’t uniform across everyone. It’s calibrated to how much you can be there for each person right now.

That’s not lowering standards. It’s being honest about the deal you’re offering.

If I’m giving someone significant time and attention this quarter, I can hold them to a very high standard and they know I mean it. If someone is relatively independent and not taking much of my attention, the growth bar I can fairly hold them to is correspondingly lower. I haven’t earned the right to demand more.

This sounds uncomfortable because we’re trained to believe standards should apply equally. But equal standards with unequal support is unfair.

Where I’ve Gotten This Wrong

I’ve erred on the softer side more than I’d like.

There have been people I kept in high-support, high-belief mode for too long, long past the point where the honest answer was that the fit wasn’t right. I stayed in “I’ll help you get there” mode because I wanted to, and because acknowledging it wasn’t working felt like giving up on someone.

That’s not kindness. It’s avoidance. And it’s unfair to the person, who deserves clarity over comfort.

The Real Standard

High standards without support looks like leadership from the outside, but the people inside it know it’s just performance.

The harder thing, the thing that develops people, is holding the bar and then doing the work alongside them. Not doing it for them. Not reviewing their work from a distance. Sitting down and working through it together, in the unglamorous way, until the standard becomes something they’ve experienced rather than something they’ve been told about.

When both halves of that are true, people do the best work of their careers, not because you’ve extracted it from them, but because you’ve given them a clear direction and a real partner in getting there. I keep learning this the same way every time: by being too far on one side, noticing the gap, and walking back toward the middle.

More writing
Designing an Organization When Every Framework Says Something Different
Every org design framework is right, and they each point you somewhere different. What to do when the answers don't match.
May 2026
The Unglamorous Core of Payments
The smooth checkout is an illusion. The unglamorous infrastructure work behind it is where payments actually live.
Apr 2026
The Best Tech Is Not the Best Partner
Why partner selection in FinTech comes down to compliance posture and relationship depth, not which integration looks cleanest.
Apr 2026